On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> The test passes now. So let's remove xfail.
>
> 2014-10-29 Evgeny Stupachenko
>
> gcc/testsuite
> * gcc.target/i386/pr23098.c: Remove xfail.
OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
The test passes now. So let's remove xfail.
2014-10-29 Evgeny Stupachenko
gcc/testsuite
* gcc.target/i386/pr23098.c: Remove xfail.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr23098.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr23098.c
index 7f118dc..7f118bb 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.targe
Evgeny Stupachenko writes:
> Reattached.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>>
>>> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>>>
>>> PR target/8340
>>> PR middle-end/476
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> RA improvements are the way to go -- however, my understanding is that
> overall the code is better now than it was before Intel's changes, so I
> don't consider the performance side as a blocker for this code.
>
The new approach improves PIC c
On 10/14/14 07:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
For the first two, I think (and said it before already) that the current
model of emitting set_got from a target hook during RA can't work, as there
can be calls in the prologue, and the prologue is inserted before the
set_got in that case. I really think
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:49 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko
> wrote:
>> Reattached.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
>>> wrote:
>>>
ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:03:38AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> Can you add a PR markers to your changelog
>
> PR target/8340
> PR middle-end/47602
> PR rtl-optimization/55458
>
> Actually I think there is an additional test in 47602. Can you please add
> it to the suite? You'll a
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Reattached.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>>
>>> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>>>
>>> PR target/83
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Reattached.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>>
>>> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>>>
>>> PR target/83
Reattached.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
> wrote:
>
>> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>
>> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>>
>> PR target/8340
>> PR middle-end/47602
>> PR rtl-optimization/55458
>>
On 10/13/14 08:53, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
ChangeLog for testsuite:
2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
PR target/8340
PR middle-end/47602
PR rtl-optimization/55458
* gcc.target/i386/pic-1.c: Remove dg-error as test should pass now.
* gcc.target/i386/
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>
> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>
> PR target/8340
> PR middle-end/47602
> PR rtl-optimization/55458
> * gcc.target/i386/pic-1.c: Remove dg-error as test should pass now.
>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/14 01:42, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The patch enables EBX in RA for x86 32bits PIC mode.
>> It was discussed here:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02513.html
>> Now there is working version with good perfo
On 10/10/14 01:42, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
Hi,
The patch enables EBX in RA for x86 32bits PIC mode.
It was discussed here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02513.html
Now there is working version with good performance and stability level
- it could be a solid first step of EBX ena
On 2014-10-10 3:42 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
Hi,
The patch enables EBX in RA for x86 32bits PIC mode.
It was discussed here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02513.html
Now there is working version with good performance and stability level
- it could be a solid first step of EBX
Hi,
The patch enables EBX in RA for x86 32bits PIC mode.
It was discussed here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02513.html
Now there is working version with good performance and stability level
- it could be a solid first step of EBX enabling.
Bootstrap and make check passed.
There
16 matches
Mail list logo