On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > +/* This structure is part of the interface between
> > lower_rec_simd_input_clauses
> > + and lower_rec_input_clauses. */
> > +
> > +struct omplow_simd_context {
> > + tree idx;
> > + tree lane;
> > + int max_vf;
> > + bool is_simt;
>
> Any re
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 06:02:06PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > > +struct omplow_simd_context {
> > > + tree idx;
> > > + tree lane;
> > > + int max_vf;
> > > + bool is_simt;
> >
> > Any reason ivar and lvar weren't added there too?
>
> Yes, they are not part of 'persistently live cont
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:07:41PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> In preparation to handle new SIMT privatization in
> lower_rec_simd_input_clauses
> this patch factors out variables common to this and lower_rec_input_clauses to
> a new structure. No functional change intended.
>
> * om
In preparation to handle new SIMT privatization in lower_rec_simd_input_clauses
this patch factors out variables common to this and lower_rec_input_clauses to
a new structure. No functional change intended.
* omp-low.c (omplow_simd_context): New struct. Use it...
(lower_rec_simd_
