On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:26 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 8:40 PM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Andrew Pinski
> >
> > So the problem here is that replace_phi_edge_with_variable
> > will copy range information to a already (not newly) defi
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 8:40 PM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Pinski
>
> So the problem here is that replace_phi_edge_with_variable
> will copy range information to a already (not newly) defined
> ssa name. This causes wrong code later on.
That's a bit too conservative I gue
From: Andrew Pinski
So the problem here is that replace_phi_edge_with_variable
will copy range information to a already (not newly) defined
ssa name. This causes wrong code later on.
This patch fixes the problem by requiring there to be statements
that are to be placed before the conditional to
