on 2021/1/27 下午5:43, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> on 2021/1/26 下午6:53, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Segher/Richard B./Richard S.,
>>>
>>> Many thanks for your all helps and comments on this!
>>>
>>> on 2021/1/25 下午3:56, Richard Biener wrote:
On
on 2021/1/26 下午6:53, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
>> Hi Segher/Richard B./Richard S.,
>>
>> Many thanks for your all helps and comments on this!
>>
>> on 2021/1/25 下午3:56, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>>
On Fri, J
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 11:47:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Anyway, I think the GIMPLE -> RTL transition currently is a too
> big step
Much agreed. I also think that the expand pass itself needs a lot of
work to bring it into this century: it does much too much work, in a
circuitous wa
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:53:25PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> on 2021/1/26 上午4:37, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 05:59:23PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> But what could have been done d
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi Segher/Richard B./Richard S.,
>
> Many thanks for your all helps and comments on this!
>
> on 2021/1/25 下午3:56, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:47:06PM +0100, Richard Biener w
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:47:06PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> > > What is holding up this patch still? K
on 2021/1/26 上午4:37, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 05:59:23PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
But what could have been done differently that would have helped? Of
course Ke Wen co
on 2021/1/26 上午1:59, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:47:06PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> What is holding up this patch st
Hi Segher/Richard B./Richard S.,
Many thanks for your all helps and comments on this!
on 2021/1/25 下午3:56, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:47:06PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote
Hi!
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 05:59:23PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> But what could have been done differently that would have helped? Of
> >> course Ke Wen could have written a better patch (aka one that is more
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:47:06PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> > > What is holding up this patch still? Ke Wen has pinged it every month
>> > > since May, and there
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:47:06PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > What is holding up this patch still? Ke Wen has pinged it every month
> > > since May, and there has still not been a review.
>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:47:06PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > What is holding up this patch still? Ke Wen has pinged it every month
> > since May, and there has still not been a review.
Richard Sandiford wrote:
> FAOD (since I'm on cc:), I do
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What is holding up this patch still? Ke Wen has pinged it every month
> since May, and there has still not been a review.
I don't like it, it feels wrong but I don't have a good suggestion
that had positive feedback. Since a reviewer / a
Segher Boessenkool writes:
> Hi!
>
> What is holding up this patch still? Ke Wen has pinged it every month
> since May, and there has still not been a review.
FAOD (since I'm on cc:), I don't feel qualified to review this.
Tree-level loop stuff isn't really my area.
Thanks,
Richard
>
>
> Seghe
Hi!
What is holding up this patch still? Ke Wen has pinged it every month
since May, and there has still not been a review.
Segher
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:19:59PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
>
> 2020-MM-DD Kewen Lin
>
> * cfgloop.h (struct loop): New field estimat
Hi,
Gentle ping^7 for:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
BR,
Kewen
on 2020/12/17 上午10:58, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gentle ping^6 for:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
>
> BR,
> Kewen
>
> on 2020/11/19 下午1:50, K
Hi,
Gentle ping^6 for:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
BR,
Kewen
on 2020/11/19 下午1:50, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gentle ping^5 for:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
>
> BR,
> Kewen
>
> on 2020/11/2 下午5:13, Kew
Hi,
Gentle ping^5 for:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
BR,
Kewen
on 2020/11/2 下午5:13, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gentle ping^4 this:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
>
> BR,
> Kewen
>
> on 2020/10/13 下午3:06, Ke
Hi,
Gentle ping^4 this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
BR,
Kewen
on 2020/10/13 下午3:06, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gentle ping this:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
>
> BR,
> Kewen
>
> on 2020/9/15 下午3:44, Kew
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
BR,
Kewen
on 2020/9/15 下午3:44, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gentle ping this:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
>
> BR,
> Kewen
>
> on 2020/8/31 下午1:49, Kewen.
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
BR,
Kewen
on 2020/8/31 下午1:49, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to gentle ping this since IVOPTs part is already to land.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
Hi,
I'd like to gentle ping this since IVOPTs part is already to land.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546698.html
BR,
Kewen
on 2020/5/28 下午8:19, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
>
> 2020-MM-DD Kewen Lin
>
> * cfgloop.h (struct loop): New field e
gcc/ChangeLog
2020-MM-DD Kewen Lin
* cfgloop.h (struct loop): New field estimated_unroll.
* tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (decide_unroll_const_iter): New function.
(decide_unroll_runtime_iter): Likewise.
(decide_unroll_stupid): Likewise.
(estimate_unroll_factor
24 matches
Mail list logo
