On 11/14/2011 01:18 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 08:08 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
Andrew, what's the state of discussion on the atomics library? While I
understand that vendors want to be able to replace that library, and thus we
want to settle on a standard ABI, I think *not* provi
>
> There is unfortunately no guarantee that your kernel has support for the 64bit
> cases, since this was only recently added - and the libgcc code checks
> and aborts if linked in.
I don't see how this patch will change status-quo.
Richard: I've not been able to test the patch yet given that tr
On 11/14/2011 08:08 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
> There is unfortunately no guarantee that your kernel has support for the 64bit
> cases, since this was only recently added - and the libgcc code checks
> and aborts if linked in.
>
> (As far as I can tell there is approximately one potential user of 6
On 11 November 2011 23:32, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw
> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan
> ---
> gcc/config/arm/arm.c | 4
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> index 6ef6f62..abf8ce1 100644
> --- a
Cc: Richard Earnshaw
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan
---
gcc/config/arm/arm.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
index 6ef6f62..abf8ce1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
@@ -1096,6 +1096,10 @
