Re: [PATCH 1/4] Missed opportunity to use [SU]ABD

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 7:59 PM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Thanks for the update. Some of these comments would have applied > to the first version, so sorry for not catching them first time. > > writes: > > From: oluade01 > > > > This adds a recognition pattern for the non-widening > > absolu

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Missed opportunity to use [SU]ABD

Thanks for the update. Some of these comments would have applied to the first version, so sorry for not catching them first time. writes: > From: oluade01 > > This adds a recognition pattern for the non-widening > absolute difference (ABD). > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * doc/md.texi (sabd, uabd

[PATCH 1/4] Missed opportunity to use [SU]ABD

From: oluade01 This adds a recognition pattern for the non-widening absolute difference (ABD). gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/md.texi (sabd, uabd): Document them. * internal-fn.def (ABD): Use new optab. * optabs.def (sabd_optab, uabd_optab): New optabs, * tree-vect-pattern