On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 1:05 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/15/25 11:18 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > The start_sequence/end_sequence interface was a big improvement over
> > the previous state, but one slightly awkward thing about it is that
> > you have to call get_insns before end_sequence
On 5/15/25 11:18 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
The start_sequence/end_sequence interface was a big improvement over
the previous state, but one slightly awkward thing about it is that
you have to call get_insns before end_sequence in order to get the
insn sequence itself:
I can't even remember
The start_sequence/end_sequence interface was a big improvement over
the previous state, but one slightly awkward thing about it is that
you have to call get_insns before end_sequence in order to get the
insn sequence itself:
To get the contents of the sequence just made, you must call
`get_
