On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 11:31:33AM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> James,
>
> Since other members of the "tune_params" structure were signed
> integers, even though negative numbers would make no sense for most
> either, I followed the same pattern.
>
> Regardless, here's a patch with unsigned in
James,
Since other members of the "tune_params" structure were signed integers,
even though negative numbers would make no sense for most either, I
followed the same pattern.
Regardless, here's a patch with unsigned integers as you requested:
[AArch64] Add extra tuning parameters for targ
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:21:03PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> Please, ignore the previous patch. This is the intended patch.
>
> Sorry.
>
> --
> Evandro Menezes
>
> On 11/04/2015 05:18 PM, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> >This patch adds extra tuning information about AArch64 targets:
> >
> > *
Please, ignore the previous patch. This is the intended patch.
Sorry.
--
Evandro Menezes
On 11/04/2015 05:18 PM, Evandro Menezes wrote:
This patch adds extra tuning information about AArch64 targets:
* Maximum number of case values before resorting to a jump table
The default values assu
This patch adds extra tuning information about AArch64 targets:
* Maximum number of case values before resorting to a jump table
The default values assumed independently of the specific backends
may be rather low for modern processors, which sport quite efficient
direct branch predictio
