Re: [PATCH 1/3] libstdc++: Remove std::bind_front specialization for no bound args

2023-09-12 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 12 Sept 2023 at 13:46, Patrick Palka via Libstdc++ wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > This specialization for the case of no bound args, added by > > r13-4214-gcbd05ca5ab1231, seems to be mostly obsoleted by > > r13-5033-ge2eab3c4edb6aa which added [[no_unique_addre

Re: [PATCH 1/3] libstdc++: Remove std::bind_front specialization for no bound args

2023-09-12 Thread Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Patrick Palka wrote: > This specialization for the case of no bound args, added by > r13-4214-gcbd05ca5ab1231, seems to be mostly obsoleted by > r13-5033-ge2eab3c4edb6aa which added [[no_unique_address]] to the > main template's data members. And the compile time advantage of

[PATCH 1/3] libstdc++: Remove std::bind_front specialization for no bound args

2023-09-11 Thread Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
This specialization for the case of no bound args, added by r13-4214-gcbd05ca5ab1231, seems to be mostly obsoleted by r13-5033-ge2eab3c4edb6aa which added [[no_unique_address]] to the main template's data members. And the compile time advantage of avoiding an empty tuple and index_sequence seems m