Re: [PATCH 1/3] c++: Handle ABI for non-polymorphic dynamic classes

On 8/20/24 7:38 PM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? OK. -- >8 -- The Itanium ABI has specific rules for when virtual tables for dynamic classes should be emitted. However we didn't consider structures with virtual inheritance but no vi

Re: [PATCH 1/3] c++: Handle ABI for non-polymorphic dynamic classes

Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/660956.html (and the rest of this series). On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 09:38:44AM +1000, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? > > -- >8 -- > > The Itanium ABI has specific rules for wh

Re: [PATCH 1/3] c++: Handle ABI for non-polymorphic dynamic classes

Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/660956.html. On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 09:38:44AM +1000, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? > > -- >8 -- > > The Itanium ABI has specific rules for when virtual tables for dynamic

Re: [PATCH 1/3] c++: Handle ABI for non-polymorphic dynamic classes

Ping. On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 09:38:44AM +1000, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? > > -- >8 -- > > The Itanium ABI has specific rules for when virtual tables for dynamic > classes should be emitted. However we didn't consider structures wi

[PATCH 1/3] c++: Handle ABI for non-polymorphic dynamic classes

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? -- >8 -- The Itanium ABI has specific rules for when virtual tables for dynamic classes should be emitted. However we didn't consider structures with virtual inheritance but no virtual members as dynamic classes for ABI purposes; t