On 05/19/2016 01:24 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 05/16/2016 03:55 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> On 05/16/2016 12:13 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
Hi Martin,
Could you please rebase this patch and the profiling one against
latest trunk? The
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 03:55 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 05/16/2016 12:13 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>>> Could you please rebase this patch and the profiling one against
>>> latest trunk? The third patch was applied before these two now.
>
On 05/16/2016 03:55 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 12:13 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>> Could you please rebase this patch and the profiling one against
>> latest trunk? The third patch was applied before these two now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> bin
>
> Hello.
>
> Sending the rebased vers
On 05/16/2016 12:13 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> Could you please rebase this patch and the profiling one against
> latest trunk? The third patch was applied before these two now.
>
> Thanks,
> bin
Hello.
Sending the rebased version of the patch.
Martin
>From a91b1578f3907e05543b2acea00
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:42 AM, marxin wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2016-04-25 Martin Liska
>
> * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c(comp_cost::operator=): New function.
> (comp_cost::infinite_cost_p): Likewise.
> (operator+): Likewise.
> (comp_cost::operator+=): Likewise.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-04-25 Martin Liska
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c(comp_cost::operator=): New function.
(comp_cost::infinite_cost_p): Likewise.
(operator+): Likewise.
(comp_cost::operator+=): Likewise.
(comp_cost::operator-=): Likewise.
(comp_cost::