On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 10:08 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> > On 06/27/2012 09:07 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>> May I ask about the purpose of the following piece of change? Doesn't
>>
On 06/27/2012 10:08 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> > On 06/27/2012 09:07 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>>> >> May I ask about the purpose of the following piece of change? Doesn't
>>> >> it affect non-sse cases either?
>> >
>> > Err, no, it doesn
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 09:07 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>> May I ask about the purpose of the following piece of change? Doesn't
>> it affect non-sse cases either?
>
> Err, no, it doesn't affect non-sse cases. All MODE_VECTOR_INT
> cases will be im
On 06/27/2012 09:07 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> May I ask about the purpose of the following piece of change? Doesn't
> it affect non-sse cases either?
Err, no, it doesn't affect non-sse cases. All MODE_VECTOR_INT
cases will be implemented in the xmm registers (ignoring the
deprecated and largely
il.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add rtx costs for sse integer ops
---
gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 50 ++-
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index
e2f5740..578a756 100644
--- a/
---
gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 50 ++-
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index e2f5740..578a756 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -31990,13 +
