On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:49:33AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Segher Boessenkool
>> wrote:
>> > This makes a few functions used only in shrink-wrap.c static, and
>> > removes their declarations from shrin
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:49:33AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> > This makes a few functions used only in shrink-wrap.c static, and
> > removes their declarations from shrink-wrap.h .
> It breaks build on i386:
Sorry about that. I did gr
On 09/10/2015 12:49 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
This makes a few functions used only in shrink-wrap.c static, and
removes their declarations from shrink-wrap.h .
Bootstrapped and regression checked on powerpc64-linux. Is this
okay for mainline
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> This makes a few functions used only in shrink-wrap.c static, and
> removes their declarations from shrink-wrap.h .
>
> Bootstrapped and regression checked on powerpc64-linux. Is this
> okay for mainline?
>
>
> Segher
>
>
> 2015-09-10
On 09/10/2015 05:14 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> * shrink-wrap.c (requires_stack_frame_p): Make static.
> (prepare_shrink_wrap): Likewise.
> (dup_block_and_redirect): Likewise.
> * shrink-wrap.h: Remove declarations of those functions.
This is ok.
Bernd
This makes a few functions used only in shrink-wrap.c static, and
removes their declarations from shrink-wrap.h .
Bootstrapped and regression checked on powerpc64-linux. Is this
okay for mainline?
Segher
2015-09-10 Segher Boessenkool
* shrink-wrap.c (requires_stack_frame_p): Make
