On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 01:46, Patrick Palka via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> Instead of defining these in terms of a helper class template
> and the relatively expensive __remove_cv_t, just declare four
> explicit specializations of the main template, one for each choice
> of cv-quals.
>
> Tested on x86_6
Instead of defining these in terms of a helper class template
and the relatively expensive __remove_cv_t, just declare four
explicit specializations of the main template, one for each choice
of cv-quals.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
The is_void change alone reduces m
