Re: [PATCH 1/2] libphobos: fix CET for non-glibc targets

Excerpts from ibuc...@gdcproject.org's message of December 20, 2021 4:00 pm: >> On 20/12/2021 16:41 Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote: >> >> >> Excerpts from ibuc...@gdcproject.org's message of December 20, 2021 8:56 am: >> >> On 20/12/2021 01:08 Alex Xu (Hello71) via Gcc-patches >> >> wrote: >> >> >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] libphobos: fix CET for non-glibc targets

> On 20/12/2021 16:41 Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote: > > > Excerpts from ibuc...@gdcproject.org's message of December 20, 2021 8:56 am: > >> On 20/12/2021 01:08 Alex Xu (Hello71) via Gcc-patches > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On musl, linking against libphobos fails because it requires ucontext > >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] libphobos: fix CET for non-glibc targets

Excerpts from ibuc...@gdcproject.org's message of December 20, 2021 8:56 am: >> On 20/12/2021 01:08 Alex Xu (Hello71) via Gcc-patches >> wrote: >> >> >> On musl, linking against libphobos fails because it requires ucontext >> but is not explicitly linked against it. This is caused by configure

Re: [PATCH 1/2] libphobos: fix CET for non-glibc targets

> On 20/12/2021 01:08 Alex Xu (Hello71) via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > > On musl, linking against libphobos fails because it requires ucontext > but is not explicitly linked against it. This is caused by configure > assuming that it is implemented in assembly, but it is actually not > implemente

[PATCH 1/2] libphobos: fix CET for non-glibc targets

On musl, linking against libphobos fails because it requires ucontext but is not explicitly linked against it. This is caused by configure assuming that it is implemented in assembly, but it is actually not implemented. This silently works on other libcs because context API does not require an exte