Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity

Subject: Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:28 PM Aleksandar Rakic wrote: > > Hi! > > I'd like to ping the following patch: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html > a

Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:28 PM Aleksandar Rakic wrote: > > Hi! > > I'd like to ping the following patch: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html > a patch for the computation of the complexity for the unsupported > addressing modes in ivopts The thread starting at

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity

Hi! I'd like to ping the following patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html a patch for the computation of the complexity for the unsupported addressing modes in ivopts This patch should be a fix for the bug which is described on the following link: https:/

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity

Hi! I'd like to ping the following patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html a patch for the computation of the complexity for the unsupported addressing modes in ivopts This patch should be a fix for the bug which is described on the following link: https:/

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

PING: I remind you that the patch for the computation of complexity for unsupported addressing modes ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429 ) has been sent: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

I remind you that the patch for the computation of complexity for unsupported addressing modes ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429 ) has been sent: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

I remind you that the patch for the computation of complexity for unsupported addressing modes ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429 ) has been sent: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

Here is a patch for the GCC bug 109429.

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

Ping for patch from December 2022: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608895.html

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

s. Also given complexity is only a tie-breaker we should cost the compensation somehow, but then complexity doesn't look necessary ... Meh. > > Kind regards, > Dimitrije > > From: Richard Biener > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2022 10:58 AM > To: Dimitrije Milosevic >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

or each case of an unsupported addressing mode. Kind regards, Dimitrije From: Richard Biener Sent: Friday, December 16, 2022 10:58 AM To: Dimitrije Milosevic Cc: Jeff Law ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org ; Djordje Todorovic Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost com

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

xity" value then each compensation step should add to the complexity? > I'd love to get feedback regarding this, so I could focus on a concrete > approach. > > Kind regards, > Dimitrije > > From: Richard Biener > Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 2:35 PM &

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

ds, Dimitrije From: Richard Biener Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 2:35 PM To: Dimitrije Milosevic Cc: Jeff Law ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org ; Djordje Todorovic Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.   On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 9:40 AM Dimitrije Milosevic wro

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

> From: Jeff Law > Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 7:46 PM > To: Richard Biener; Dimitrije Milosevic > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Djordje Todorovic > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost > complexity. > > > On 10/28/22 01:00,

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity. On 10/28/22 01:00, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 8:43 AM Dimitrije Milosevic > wrote: >> Hi Jeff, >> >>> THe part I don't understand is, if you only have BASE+OFF, wh

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

On 10/28/22 01:00, Richard Biener wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 8:43 AM Dimitrije Milosevic wrote: Hi Jeff, THe part I don't understand is, if you only have BASE+OFF, why does preventing the calculation of more complex addressing modes matter? ie, what's the point of computing the cost of

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

n. Would love to hear your thoughts. [0] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604304.html Regards, Dimitrije From: Richard Biener Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 9:00 AM To: Dimitrije Milosevic Cc: Jeff Law ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org ; Djordje Todorovic Subject: Re: [PATCH

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

(maybe also yourself) to walk through the function with a specific candidate / use where you think the complexity (or cost) is wrong? > Regards, > Dimitrije > > > From: Jeff Law > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 1:02 AM > To: Dimitrije Milosevic ; > gcc-patches@gcc.g

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

imitrije Milosevic ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Djordje Todorovic Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.   On 10/21/22 07:52, Dimitrije Milosevic wrote: > From: Dimitrije Milošević > > This patch reverts the computation of address cost com

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

On 10/21/22 07:52, Dimitrije Milosevic wrote: From: Dimitrije Milošević This patch reverts the computation of address cost complexity to the legacy one. After f9f69dd, complexity is calculated using the valid_mem_ref_p target hook. Architectures like Mips only allow BASE + OFFSET addressing m

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

From: Richard Biener Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 1:08 PM To: Dimitrije Milosevic Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org ; Djordje Todorovic Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.   On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 3:56 PM Dimitrije Milosevic wrote: > > From: Dimitrije Mi

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 3:56 PM Dimitrije Milosevic wrote: > > From: Dimitrije Milošević > > This patch reverts the computation of address cost complexity > to the legacy one. After f9f69dd, complexity is calculated > using the valid_mem_ref_p target hook. Architectures like > Mips only allow BAS

[PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

From: Dimitrije Milošević This patch reverts the computation of address cost complexity to the legacy one. After f9f69dd, complexity is calculated using the valid_mem_ref_p target hook. Architectures like Mips only allow BASE + OFFSET addressing modes, which in turn prevents the calculation of co