On 2/22/24 03:51, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Ping!
Hmm, I'm somewhat reluctant to backport a significant behavior change
like this just to silence a testsuite failure, even though I think the
change is correct. Maybe just xfail the tests for GCC 13?
Jason
On 2024-02-07 17:19, Torbjorn SVEN
Ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-02-07 17:19, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport b7e4a4c626eeeb32c291d5bbbaa148c5081b6bfd to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL:
gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_
Hi,
Is it okay to backport b7e4a4c626eeeb32c291d5bbbaa148c5081b6bfd to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL:
gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_early-O2.c
(test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251-
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:45 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
OK
> -- 8< --
>
> -Waddress-of-packed-member, in addition to the documented warning about
> taking the address of a packed member, also warns about casting from
> a pointer to a TYPE_PACKED type t
On Nov 22, 2023, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
FYI, Linaro's regression tester let me know that my patch reversal, that
expected this patch to go in instead, caused two "regressions".
https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1067
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hack
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
-- 8< --
-Waddress-of-packed-member, in addition to the documented warning about
taking the address of a packed member, also warns about casting from
a pointer to a TYPE_PACKED type to a pointer to a type with greater
alignment.
This wrongly warns if the
