On 12/18/24 11:56 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/17/24 10:43 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk? Shall we also backport this to release branches?
It's not a regression but seems like
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/17/24 10:43 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
> > OK for trunk? Shall we also backport this to release branches?
> > It's not a regression but seems like a safe fix for an inconvenient
>
On 12/17/24 10:43 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk? Shall we also backport this to release branches?
It's not a regression but seems like a safe fix for an inconvenient
issue.
OK for trunk and 14.
I wonder about using __bu
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:43:49AM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
> > OK for trunk? Shall we also backport this to release branches?
> > It's not a regression but seems like a safe fix f
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:43:49AM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
> OK for trunk? Shall we also backport this to release branches?
> It's not a regression but seems like a safe fix for an inconvenient
> issue.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> For
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk? Shall we also backport this to release branches?
It's not a regression but seems like a safe fix for an inconvenient
issue.
-- >8 --
For the testcase in the PR we hang during constraint normalization
ultimately becau