Re: [PATCH 1/2] Use build_zero_cst or build_one_cst.

On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote: I think that we don't want to canonicalize build_int_cst (..., [01]) to build_{one,zero}_cst. The former is really more descriptive. The build_{one,zero}_cst wrappers were introduced for the fold_convert (type, integer_{one,zero}_node) idiom as fold_conver

[PATCH 1/2] Use build_zero_cst or build_one_cst.

--- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c | 32 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c index 4acfc67..2ee3f6e 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c @@ -101,7 +101