On 2012-06-11 01:34, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Ping?
>
> On 2012/6/1 06:24 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> On 12/5/23 1:46 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 05/18/12 03:48, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
@@ -2401,6 +2401,7 @@ scan_trace (dw_trace_info *trace)
{
/* Propagate across fallt
Ping?
On 2012/6/1 06:24 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 12/5/23 1:46 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 05/18/12 03:48, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>> @@ -2401,6 +2401,7 @@ scan_trace (dw_trace_info *trace)
>>> {
>>> /* Propagate across fallthru edges. */
>>> dwarf2out_flush_queued_reg_
On 12/5/23 1:46 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 05/18/12 03:48, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> @@ -2401,6 +2401,7 @@ scan_trace (dw_trace_info *trace)
>> {
>>/* Propagate across fallthru edges. */
>>dwarf2out_flush_queued_reg_saves ();
>> + def_cfa_1 (&this_cfa);
>>ma
On 05/18/12 03:48, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> @@ -2401,6 +2401,7 @@ scan_trace (dw_trace_info *trace)
> {
> /* Propagate across fallthru edges. */
> dwarf2out_flush_queued_reg_saves ();
> + def_cfa_1 (&this_cfa);
> maybe_record_trace_start (insn, NULL);
> b
On 05/18/12 03:48, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a few changes were needed to the dwarf2 pass when trying to
> implement epilogue unwind for SH, mainly that the current handling of
> annulled-taken branches does not seem correct; the delay slot insn
> should be handled in a manner simila
Hi,
I found a few changes were needed to the dwarf2 pass when trying to
implement epilogue unwind for SH, mainly that the current handling of
annulled-taken branches does not seem correct; the delay slot insn
should be handled in a manner similar to an insn in the fallthru block.
Cross-tested on
