On 05/23/2018 10:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/23/2018 04:50 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
On 05/23/2018 07:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:41 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Sorry. Does the following fix it for i686?
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop
On 05/23/2018 04:50 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 05/23/2018 07:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:41 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>
> Sorry. Does the following fix it for i686?
>
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.
On 05/23/2018 07:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:41 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Sorry. Does the following fix it for i686?
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
===
--- gc
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:41 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Sorry. Does the following fix it for i686?
>>>
>>
>> Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c
>> ===
>> --- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-pref
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/23/2018 05:01 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Luis Machado
>>> wrote:
On 05/16/2018 08:18 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>
>>>
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>
> On 05/23/2018 05:01 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Luis Machado
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/16/2018 08:18 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
On 05/16/2018 06:08 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
On 05/23/2018 05:01 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
On 05/16/2018 08:18 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
On 05/16/2018 06:08 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 15/05/18 12:12, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
On 05/15/2018 06:37 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Luis
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>
> On 05/16/2018 08:18 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/16/2018 06:08 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15/05/18 12:12, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
On 05/15/2018 06:37 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> Hi
On 05/22/2018 12:55 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>
> On 05/16/2018 08:18 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/16/2018 06:08 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15/05/18 12:12, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
On 05/15/2018 06:37 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> On 14/05/
On 05/16/2018 08:18 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
On 05/16/2018 06:08 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 15/05/18 12:12, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
On 05/15/2018 06:37 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Luis,
On 14/05/18 22:18, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
Here's an updated version of the patch (now reverted)
On 05/16/2018 06:08 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 15/05/18 12:12, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
On 05/15/2018 06:37 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Luis,
On 14/05/18 22:18, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
Here's an updated version of the patch (now reverted) that addresses
the previous bootstrap problem
On 15/05/18 12:12, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
On 05/15/2018 06:37 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Luis,
On 14/05/18 22:18, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
Here's an updated version of the patch (now reverted) that addresses the
previous bootstrap problem (signedness and long long/int conversion).
I've
Hi,
On 05/15/2018 06:37 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Luis,
On 14/05/18 22:18, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
Here's an updated version of the patch (now reverted) that addresses
the previous bootstrap problem (signedness and long long/int conversion).
I've checked that it bootstraps properly on b
Hi Luis,
On 14/05/18 22:18, Luis Machado wrote:
Hi,
Here's an updated version of the patch (now reverted) that addresses the
previous bootstrap problem (signedness and long long/int conversion).
I've checked that it bootstraps properly on both aarch64-linux and x86_64-linux
and that tests lo
suite and bootstrapped ok on aarch64-linux.
Ok?
>From e0207950a6d7793cdaceaa71fc5ada05a93dc1b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luis Machado
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:23:59 -0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce prefetch-minimum stride option
This patch adds a new option to control the minimum st
On 05/07/2018 12:15 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
On 05/01/2018 03:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/22/2018 06:46 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
This patch adds a new option to control the minimum stride, for a memory
reference, after which the loop prefetc
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>
> On 05/01/2018 03:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 01/22/2018 06:46 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch adds a new option to control the minimum stride, for a memory
>>> reference, after which the loop prefetch pass may issue software
On 05/01/2018 03:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/22/2018 06:46 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
This patch adds a new option to control the minimum stride, for a memory
reference, after which the loop prefetch pass may issue software prefetch
hints for. There are two motivations:
* Make the pass less agg
On 01/22/2018 06:46 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
> This patch adds a new option to control the minimum stride, for a memory
> reference, after which the loop prefetch pass may issue software prefetch
> hints for. There are two motivations:
>
> * Make the pass less aggressive, only issuing prefetch hint
Hi Kyrill,
On 01/23/2018 07:32 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Luis,
On 22/01/18 13:46, Luis Machado wrote:
This patch adds a new option to control the minimum stride, for a memory
reference, after which the loop prefetch pass may issue software prefetch
hints for. There are two motivations:
* M
Hi Luis,
On 22/01/18 13:46, Luis Machado wrote:
This patch adds a new option to control the minimum stride, for a memory
reference, after which the loop prefetch pass may issue software prefetch
hints for. There are two motivations:
* Make the pass less aggressive, only issuing prefetch hints f
This patch adds a new option to control the minimum stride, for a memory
reference, after which the loop prefetch pass may issue software prefetch
hints for. There are two motivations:
* Make the pass less aggressive, only issuing prefetch hints for bigger strides
that are more likely to benefit f
22 matches
Mail list logo