>longjmp (target->fc->jbuf, 1);
>
>
> Igor
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andreas Schwab [mailto:sch...@linux-m68k.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 2:51 PM
>> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V
>> Cc: Jeff Law ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; i..
68k.org]
> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 2:51 PM
> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V
> Cc: Jeff Law ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; i...@airs.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/22] Add Intel CET support for EH in libgcc.
>
> In file included from ../../../libgcc/config/ia64/unwind-ia64.c:2448:
> ../
In file included from ../../../libgcc/config/ia64/unwind-ia64.c:2448:
../../../libgcc/unwind.inc: In function '_Unwind_RaiseException':
../../../libgcc/unwind.inc:140:3: error: too many arguments to function
'uw_install_context'
uw_install_context (&this_context, &cur_context, frames);
^
el-CET-support-for-EH-in-libgcc.patch
>
>
> From 47fe033b2a23397be50455b7661ad499c42209be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Igor Tsimbalist
> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 03:04:46 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 08/22] Add Intel CET support for EH in libgcc.
>
> Control-flow Enforcement Te
New patch is attached. The difference is that all newly introduced macro
are removed except of _Unwind_Frames_Extra macro. They are replaced
with new parameters and local variables.
Igor
0008-Add-Intel-CET-support-for-EH-in-libgcc.patch
Description: 0008-Add-Intel-CET-support-for-EH-in-libgcc.p
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 8:06 PM
> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V ; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: i...@airs.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/22] Add Intel CET support for EH in libgcc.
>
> On 11/0
>>
>>> Has this been tested anywhere other than x86/x86_64 linux?
>> Yes, I tested it on arm64 system. I applied 2 patches, previous 07/22 and
>> this one 08/22. Everything
>> was built successfully. Further to the building I did testing also. No new
>> fails.
> So how does that reconcile with H-
gt; (_Unwind_Resume): Use FRAMES_VAR_DECL, FRAMES_VAR_P and
>>> FRAMES_VAR.
>>> (_Unwind_Resume_or_Rethrow): Use FRAMES_VAR_DECL,
>> FRAMES_VAR_P
>>> and FRAMES_VAR.
>>>
>>> Igor
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 0
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 5:49 AM
> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V ; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: i...@airs.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/22] Add Intel CET support for EH in libgcc.
>
> On 10/1
, FRAMES_VAR_P and
> FRAMES_VAR.
> (_Unwind_Resume_or_Rethrow): Use FRAMES_VAR_DECL, FRAMES_VAR_P
> and FRAMES_VAR.
>
> Igor
>
>
>
> 0008-Add-Intel-CET-support-for-EH-in-libgcc.patch
>
>
> From 16eb1d0d9239e039fba28f1ae71762f19061b157 Mon
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote:
>> * unwind.inc (_Unwind_RaiseException_Phase2): Use FRAMES_P_DECL,
>> FRAMES_VAR_DECL_1, FRAMES_VAR_INC and FRAMES_P_UPDATE.
>> (_Unwind_RaiseException): Use FRAMES_VAR_DE
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote:
> * unwind.inc (_Unwind_RaiseException_Phase2): Use FRAMES_P_DECL,
> FRAMES_VAR_DECL_1, FRAMES_VAR_INC and FRAMES_P_UPDATE.
> (_Unwind_RaiseException): Use FRAMES_VAR_DECL, FRAMES_VAR_P and
> FRAMES_VAR.
> (_Unwind_ForcedU
Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET), published by Intel, Introduces
the Shadow Stack feature, which ensures a return from a function is done
to exactly the same location from where the function was called. When EH
is present the control-flow transfer may skip some stack frames and the
shadow
13 matches
Mail list logo
