Re: [PATCH 07/25] [pr82089] Don't sign-extend SFV 1 in BImode

2018-09-27 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 26/09/18 17:25, Richard Sandiford wrote: OK, thanks. Committed, thanks. Andrew

Re: [PATCH 07/25] [pr82089] Don't sign-extend SFV 1 in BImode

2018-09-26 Thread Richard Sandiford
Andrew Stubbs writes: > On 17/09/18 09:40, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> writes: >>> This is an update of the patch posted to PR82089 long ago. We ran into the >>> same bug on GCN, so we need this fixed as part of this series. >>> >>> 2018-09-05 Andrew Stubbs >>> Tom de Vries >>>

Re: [PATCH 07/25] [pr82089] Don't sign-extend SFV 1 in BImode

2018-09-26 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 17/09/18 09:40, Richard Sandiford wrote: writes: This is an update of the patch posted to PR82089 long ago. We ran into the same bug on GCN, so we need this fixed as part of this series. 2018-09-05 Andrew Stubbs Tom de Vries PR82089 gcc/ * expmed

Re: [PATCH 07/25] [pr82089] Don't sign-extend SFV 1 in BImode

2018-09-17 Thread Richard Sandiford
writes: > This is an update of the patch posted to PR82089 long ago. We ran into the > same bug on GCN, so we need this fixed as part of this series. > > 2018-09-05 Andrew Stubbs > Tom de Vries > > PR82089 > > gcc/ > * expmed.c (emit_cstore): Fix handling of res

[PATCH 07/25] [pr82089] Don't sign-extend SFV 1 in BImode

2018-09-05 Thread ams
This is an update of the patch posted to PR82089 long ago. We ran into the same bug on GCN, so we need this fixed as part of this series. 2018-09-05 Andrew Stubbs Tom de Vries PR82089 gcc/ * expmed.c (emit_cstore): Fix handling of result_mode == BImode