On 08/01/2013 07:55 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 11:04 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>> > gcc/
>> >
>> >Rewrite how instances of passes are cloned to remove assumptions
>> >about their sizes (thus allowing pass subclasses to have
>> >additional data fields, albeit non
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 13:55 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
[...snip...]
> OK for trunk? (on top of the other patches, of course; see notes in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00041.html in how I've
> tested this).
...with "pipeline" renamed to "pass_manager", of course.
This patch does more than just remove the hardcoded assumptions about
pass sizes - as noted in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00041.html
it also is needed to ensure that per-pass dumpfiles get the correct
switch names.
So the short version is that patch 6 is needed for patches 3-5 to
gcc/
Rewrite how instances of passes are cloned to remove assumptions
about their sizes (thus allowing pass subclasses to have
additional data fields, albeit non-GC-managed ones at this point).
* passes.c (make_pass_instance): Now that passes have clone
met
