On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 11:02, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:13 PM Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 15:06, David Malcolm wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 19:21 +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 15:48, Richard Sandiford
> > > >
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:13 PM Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 15:06, David Malcolm wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 19:21 +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 15:48, Richard Sandiford
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Iain Buclaw writes:
> > > > > I'm just going
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 15:06, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 19:21 +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 15:48, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Iain Buclaw writes:
> > > > I'm just going to post the diff since the original here, just to
> > > > show
> > >
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 19:21 +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 15:48, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Iain Buclaw writes:
> > > I'm just going to post the diff since the original here, just to
> > > show
> > > what's been done since review comments.
> > >
> > > I think I've c
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 15:48, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Iain Buclaw writes:
> > I'm just going to post the diff since the original here, just to show
> > what's been done since review comments.
> >
> > I think I've covered all that's been addressed, except for the couple
> > of notes about the
Iain Buclaw writes:
> I'm just going to post the diff since the original here, just to show
> what's been done since review comments.
>
> I think I've covered all that's been addressed, except for the couple
> of notes about the quadratic parts (though I think one of them is
> actually O(N^2)). I
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 at 11:03, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Iain Buclaw writes:
> > On 14 October 2018 at 17:29, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >> [Sorry if this turns out to do be a dup]
> >>
> >> Iain Buclaw writes:
> >>> +/* Build nodes that are used by the D front-end.
> >>> + These are di
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 11:48, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Iain Buclaw writes:
> > +/* The LHS expression could be an assignment, to which it's operation
> > gets
> > + lost during gimplification. */
> > +if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == MODIFY_EXPR)
> > + {
> > + lexpr = compound_
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 at 11:03, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Iain Buclaw writes:
> > On 14 October 2018 at 17:29, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >> [Sorry if this turns out to do be a dup]
> >>
> >> Iain Buclaw writes:
> >>> +/* Clear the DECL_BUILT_IN_CLASS flag on the function in CALLEXP. */
>
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 at 11:03, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Iain Buclaw writes:
> > On 14 October 2018 at 17:29, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >> [Sorry if this turns out to do be a dup]
> >>
> >> Iain Buclaw writes:
> >>> +/* Helper routine for all error routines. Reports a diagnostic
> >>>
Iain Buclaw writes:
> On 14 October 2018 at 17:29, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> [Sorry if this turns out to do be a dup]
>>
>> Iain Buclaw writes:
>>> +/* Build nodes that are used by the D front-end.
>>> + These are distinct from C types. */
>>> +
>>> +static void
>>> +d_build_d_type_nodes
Iain Buclaw writes:
> On 18 September 2018 at 02:33, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> This patch adds the D front-end implementation, the only part of the
>> compiler that interacts with GCC directly, and being the parts that I
>> maintain, is something that I can talk about more directly.
>>
>> For the act
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 16:19, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 02:33 +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > This patch adds the D front-end implementation, the only part of the
> > compiler that interacts with GCC directly, and being the parts that I
> > maintain, is something that I can talk
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 02:33 +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This patch adds the D front-end implementation, the only part of the
> compiler that interacts with GCC directly, and being the parts that I
> maintain, is something that I can talk about more directly.
>
> For the actual code generation pass
On 14 October 2018 at 17:29, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> [Sorry if this turns out to do be a dup]
>
> Iain Buclaw writes:
>> On 18 September 2018 at 02:33, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> This patch adds the D front-end implementation, the only part of the
>>> compiler that interacts with GCC directly, an
[Sorry if this turns out to do be a dup]
Iain Buclaw writes:
> On 18 September 2018 at 02:33, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> This patch adds the D front-end implementation, the only part of the
>> compiler that interacts with GCC directly, and being the parts that I
>> maintain, is something that I can t
On 18 September 2018 at 02:33, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This patch adds the D front-end implementation, the only part of the
> compiler that interacts with GCC directly, and being the parts that I
> maintain, is something that I can talk about more directly.
>
> For the actual code generation pass, th
This patch adds the D front-end implementation, the only part of the
compiler that interacts with GCC directly, and being the parts that I
maintain, is something that I can talk about more directly.
For the actual code generation pass, that converts the front-end AST
to GCC trees, most parts use a
18 matches
Mail list logo
