On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 04:01 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > I looked at the ISL sources and saw that they generally had license
> > notices of the form:
> >
> > * Use of this software is governed by the GNU LGPLv2.1 license
>
> Hi Joseph,
>
> at least accor
On 08/29/2011 04:01 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I looked at the ISL sources and saw that they generally had license
notices of the form:
* Use of this software is governed by the GNU LGPLv2.1 license
Hi Joseph,
at least according to a license compatibility chart[1] published by the
FSF, it i
I looked at the ISL sources and saw that they generally had license
notices of the form:
* Use of this software is governed by the GNU LGPLv2.1 license
For use in GCC I think it needs to have the "any later version" clause to
allow distribution under later versions of the LGPL as well, so that
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:40, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I'd also like to point out that this is simply not a proper patch
> submission at all, independent of the specific issues about changes to
> prerequisites that require things to be raised and explained in a
> self-contained way on the gcc lis
I'd also like to point out that this is simply not a proper patch
submission at all, independent of the specific issues about changes to
prerequisites that require things to be raised and explained in a
self-contained way on the gcc list. Every patch submission needs an
explanation of the purp
I can't tell if this is meant to be a trunk submission or a branch
submission. But if it's a trunk submission, my previous comments still
apply: changes to prerequisites need raising on the gcc list for the
benefit of the wider audience there, and with as much detail (about what
hosts and conf
2011-07-21 Tobias Grosser
* configure: Regenerated.
* config/cloog.m4: Remove support for CLooG-ppl and CLooG-parma,
both cloog.org and legacy versions. The only supported version will
be CLooG with the isl backend.
---
ChangeLog |7 ++
config/cloog.m4
