On 5/20/21 4:57 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Is there some (semi-)automatic way to compare the results of the old
and new systems?
Yes...very "semi". There's a patch in the series that updates the
information printed from -mdebug=builtin. I use this to print the
builtins generated by the o
Hi!
Just a few small things about this -- I'll reply to more of it later.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:32:35AM -0500, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> The design of the target-specific built-in function support in the
> Power back end has not stood the test of time. The machinery is
> grossly
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:57:56AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! I'd like to ping this series. This is a big change, so I'd like to
> get it committed fairly early in stage 1. I know you have a lot stacked
> up, though.
I haven't received most of this series (only the last three patches).
Hi! I'd like to ping this series. This is a big change, so I'd like to
get it committed fairly early in stage 1. I know you have a lot stacked
up, though.
Thanks!
Bill
On 4/27/21 10:32 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
The design of the target-specific built-in function support in the
Power back end
The design of the target-specific built-in function support in the
Power back end has not stood the test of time. The machinery is
grossly inefficient, confusing, and arcane; and adding new built-in
functions is inefficient and error-prone. This patch set introduces a
replacement.
Because of th
