> I'm still a little suprised people actually read ChangeLogs, but anyway
ChangeLogs are a very effective mean of knowing whether changes were intended
or instead made by mistake for example.
> I doubt people want to be spammed with a bunch more email just for some
> changes to ChangeLogs so I'l
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:33:24PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 02:26 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> > patches individually bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, ok?
>
> I think these all look sensible. ChangeLogs ought to have slightly more
> information than "Adj
On 06/29/2016 02:26 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
patches individually bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, ok?
I think these all look sensible. ChangeLogs ought to have slightly more
information than "Adjust" in some cases, especially when you're changing
function arguments
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
This is just a bunch of adding constructors and destructors and switching to
use auto_vec more.
patches individually bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, ok?
Trev
Trevor Saunders (9):
tree.c: add [cd]tors to free_lang_data_d
c-decl.c: add [cd]tors to c
