On 2014-12-18 2:26 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
Thank you very much for your work on porting LRA to SH!
I’ve ported my target to LRA, and I have not found any LRA bits I needed to
change.
Thanks, Mike. When I did a few first ports, it never
On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> Thank you very much for your work on porting LRA to SH!
I’ve ported my target to LRA, and I have not found any LRA bits I needed to
change.
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 13:42 -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> Thank you very much for your work on porting LRA to SH! I know it
> is quite a challenge to do any RA work for this target.
The R0-ness (both, GP reg r0 and FP reg fr0) of the ISA taxes the
patience sometimes. Too often, I've been t
On 2014-12-17 7:56 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
This patch series is to make SH target use LRA and is discussed
in the PR target/55212:
[SH] Switch to LRA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
I think there are issues which should be solved before defaulting
LRA on SH and the helps from t
This patch series is to make SH target use LRA and is discussed
in the PR target/55212:
[SH] Switch to LRA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
I think there are issues which should be solved before defaulting
LRA on SH and the helps from the experts are needed. The series
are cons
