On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:23 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/11/19 3:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I didn't go over them but maybe we can postpone this to a followup
> > and for now make_none_ of them Optimization which preserves
>
> Ok, there's updated patch w/o the Optimization keyword.
O
On 11/11/19 3:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
I didn't go over them but maybe we can postpone this to a followup
and for now make_none_ of them Optimization which preserves
Ok, there's updated patch w/o the Optimization keyword.
previous behavior (I guess the optimize attribute/pragma doesn't
a
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:33 PM Martin Liska wrote:
>
> The email thread is follow up of a demo that I made here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg02220.html
>
> The patchset converts current param infrastructure to
> the option machinery. The parts 3 and 4 are quite
> mechanical.
>
The email thread is follow up of a demo that I made here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg02220.html
The patchset converts current param infrastructure to
the option machinery. The parts 3 and 4 are quite
mechanical.
I would appreciate a feedback about what parameters
should be per
