On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 17:33 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2012/10/12 06:55 AM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> > This broke the recently added thread pointer built-ins on SH, but I was
> > prepared for that, so no problem here. The attached patch is a straight
> > forward fix.
> >
> > However, with the pa
On 2012/10/12 06:55 AM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> This broke the recently added thread pointer built-ins on SH, but I was
> prepared for that, so no problem here. The attached patch is a straight
> forward fix.
>
> However, with the patch applied I get an ICE on one of the SH thread
> pointer tests: gc
Oleg Endo wrote:
> Anyway, regardless of this failure, the attached patch for SH should be
> applicable. OK?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 23:11 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> This patch set has been committed, thanks to all maintainers who
> reviewed the respective parts.
>
> Thanks,
> Chung-Lin
>
This broke the recently added thread pointer built-ins on SH, but I was
prepared for that, so no problem here. T
This patch set has been committed, thanks to all maintainers who
reviewed the respective parts.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
Full ChangeLog:
2012-10-11 Chung-Lin Tang
* builtins.c (expand_builtin_thread_pointer): New.
(expand_builtin_set_thread_pointer): New.
(expand_builtin):
Hi, following discussion here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg00229.html
(and a few other mails in the thread between Richard Sandiford)
A number of targets implement the same name __builtin_thread_pointer(),
__builtin_set_thread_pointer() TLS builtins. This set of patches changes
th
