Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add missing calls to `onlyjump_p'

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > Note that I have included unrelated though contextually connected 6/6 as > > > an RFC to verify whether this potential anomaly I have spotted has been > > > intentional. I'll be happy to drop it if that i

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add missing calls to `onlyjump_p'

On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Jeff Law wrote: > > Note that I have included unrelated though contextually connected 6/6 as > > an RFC to verify whether this potential anomaly I have spotted has been > > intentional. I'll be happy to drop it if that is the case. The remaining > > changes are I believe act

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add missing calls to `onlyjump_p'

On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > These changes have been successfully bootstrapped and regression-tested > with the `powerpc64le-linux-gnu' and `x86_64-linux-gnu' native systems; > verification with the `vax-netbsdelf' target using `powerpc64le-linux-gnu' > host has been underway

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add missing calls to `onlyjump_p'

On 12/3/20 4:34 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed here: > > > > here is a small patch series adding missing calls to `onlyjump_p' around > `any_condjump_p' and `any_uncondjump_p' use where the jump in ques

[PATCH 0/6] Add missing calls to `onlyjump_p'

Hi, As discussed here: here is a small patch series adding missing calls to `onlyjump_p' around `any_condjump_p' and `any_uncondjump_p' use where the jump in question is about to be removed. Note that I have included unr