Hi!
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 08:07:48PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 08:44:17PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Aug 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > In looking at it, I now believe that the type for _Float128 and __float128
> > > should always b
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 08:44:17PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > In looking at it, I now believe that the type for _Float128 and __float128
> > should always be the same within the compiler. Whether we would continue to
> > use the
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote:
> In looking at it, I now believe that the type for _Float128 and __float128
> should always be the same within the compiler. Whether we would continue to
> use the same type for long double and _Float128/__float128 remains to be seen.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 12:03:16PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 02:23:27AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:19:05PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:43:49AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > > > These patch
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 02:23:27AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:19:05PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:43:49AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > > These patches lay the foundation for a set of follow-on patches that will
> > > change
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:19:05PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:43:49AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > These patches lay the foundation for a set of follow-on patches that will
> > change the internal handling of 128-bit floating point types in GCC. In the
> >
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:43:49AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> These patches lay the foundation for a set of follow-on patches that will
> change the internal handling of 128-bit floating point types in GCC. In the
> future patches, I hope to change the compiler to always use KFmode for the
>
Ping patches.
Patch #1 of 5.
| Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:47:13 -0400
| Subject: [PATCH 1/5] IEEE 128-bit built-in overload support.
| Message-ID:
Patch #2 of 5.
| Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:48:51 -0400
| Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Support IEEE 128-bit overload round_to_odd built-in
functions.
| Messag
The following patches add support for doing built-in function overloading
between the two 128-bit IEEE types (i.e. _Float182/__float128 using KFmode and
when long double uses the IEEE 128-bit encoding with TFmode).
These patches lay the foundation for a set of follow-on patches that will
change th
