On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 06:03:33PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> You could e.g. have a table up to 10^(N-1) for some N, and 10^N, 10^2N
> etc. up to 10^6144 (or rather up to 10^6111, which can then be multiplied
> by a 34-digit integer significand), so that only one multiplication is
> needed to
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> I had a brief look at libbid and am totally unimpressed.
> Seems we don't implement {,unsigned} __int128 <-> _Decimal{32,64,128}
> conversions at all (we emit calls to __bid_* functions which don't exist),
That's bug 65833.
> the librar
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 06:41:44PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > - _BitInt(N) bit-fields aren't supported yet (the patch rejects them); I'd
> > like
> > to enable those incrementally, but don't really see details on how such
> > b
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> - _BitInt(N) bit-fields aren't supported yet (the patch rejects them); I'd
> like
> to enable those incrementally, but don't really see details on how such
> bit-fields should be laid-out in memory nor passed inside of function
> a
[PATCH 0/5] GCC _BitInt support [PR102989]
The following patch series introduces support for C23 bit-precise integer
types. In short, they are similar to other integral types in many ways,
just aren't subject for integral promotions if smaller than int and they can
have even much
