Jeff Law writes:
> On 05/31/14 03:02, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> A second difference was that preprocess_constraints skips disabled
>> alternatives while LRA's setup_operand_alternative doesn't; LRA just
>> checks for disabled alternatives when walking the array instead.
>> That should make no di
On 05/31/14 03:02, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Sorry Jeff, while working on the follow-on LRA patch I came across
a couple of problems, so I need another round on this.
It happens, particularly for conceptual changes like this. I don't
consider that a problem at all -- we're already in agreement o
Sorry Jeff, while working on the follow-on LRA patch I came across
a couple of problems, so I need another round on this.
First of all, I mentioned doing a follow-on patch to make LRA and
recog use the same cache for operand_alternatives. I hadn't realised
until I wrote that patch that there's a
