On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 02:43:09PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I wish that this patch did not need to use up another one of the
> primary constraint letters, but I guess there is no easy way around
> that.
It doesn't use a new constraint, but I guess you mean the new output
modifier (%e).
We c
I wish that this patch did not need to use up another one of the
primary constraint letters, but I guess there is no easy way around
that.
- David
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> All patches were bootstrapped and regression checked separately, on
> powerpc64-linux -m
All patches were bootstrapped and regression checked separately, on
powerpc64-linux -m64,-m32,-m32/-mpowerpc64; no regressions.
Is this okay to apply?
Segher
gcc/config/rs6000/constraints.md |3 +-
gcc/config/rs6000/htm.md |6 +-
gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md | 23 +-
