Pushed with LOCAL_PATCHES update :)
On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:40 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 07:38:13PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > IIUC 4/4 shouldn't be in LOCAL_PATCHES? It modifies our own test case,
> > not from the upstream.
>
> Sure, sorry.
>
> Jakub
>
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 07:38:13PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> IIUC 4/4 shouldn't be in LOCAL_PATCHES? It modifies our own test case,
> not from the upstream.
Sure, sorry.
Jakub
On Fri, 2024-11-08 at 12:35 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 02:35:34PM +0800, Kito Cheng wrote:
> > The patch set aims to update libsanitizer from upstream. The motivation is
> > that
> > RISC-V is changing the shadow offset for AddressSanitizer, and I also plan
> > to
> > s
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 02:35:34PM +0800, Kito Cheng wrote:
> The patch set aims to update libsanitizer from upstream. The motivation is
> that
> RISC-V is changing the shadow offset for AddressSanitizer, and I also plan to
> submit another patch set to add dynamic shadow offset support for GCC.
>
Kito Cheng writes:
> The patch set aims to update libsanitizer from upstream. The motivation is
> that
> RISC-V is changing the shadow offset for AddressSanitizer, and I also plan to
> submit another patch set to add dynamic shadow offset support for GCC.
>
> This is my first time updating it, s
The patch set aims to update libsanitizer from upstream. The motivation is that
RISC-V is changing the shadow offset for AddressSanitizer, and I also plan to
submit another patch set to add dynamic shadow offset support for GCC.
This is my first time updating it, so I used my laptop and an AArch64
