Re: [PATCH 0/4] S390 -march=native related fixes

2015-07-29 Thread Richard Sandiford
Dominik Vogt writes: > With that problem fixed I still see one minor glitch. Maybe > someone knows how to fix the following: > > * With a cross compiler that generates i686 binaries on s390x: > >$ i686-elf-gcc -c ~/foo.c -march=native >/home/vogt/foo.c:1:0: error: bad value (native) for -

Re: [PATCH 0/4] S390 -march=native related fixes

2015-07-24 Thread Dominik Vogt
With that problem fixed I still see one minor glitch. Maybe someone knows how to fix the following: * With a cross compiler that generates i686 binaries on s390x: $ i686-elf-gcc -c ~/foo.c -march=native /home/vogt/foo.c:1:0: error: bad value (native) for -march= switch This is all right

Re: [PATCH 0/4] S390 -march=native related fixes

2015-07-24 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 07/17/2015 06:00 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > The following series of patches contains fixes, and cleanup work > related to -march=native (and -mtune=native) for S390. > > * 0001 Fix cross compilation for S390 targets that was broken with >the original -march=native aptch. > > * 0002 Fix

[PATCH 0/4] S390 -march=native related fixes

2015-07-17 Thread Dominik Vogt
The following series of patches contains fixes, and cleanup work related to -march=native (and -mtune=native) for S390. * 0001 Fix cross compilation for S390 targets that was broken with the original -march=native aptch. * 0002 Fix handling of -march=z9_ec in old code. This bug has been