On Oct 29, 2015, at 10:39 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> David Malcolm writes:
>>
>> * adds -Wmisleading-indentation to -Wall
>
> I have doubts this is a good idea. I'm sure this will break
> a bazillion packages which (misguidedly) ship with -Wall -Werror.
>
> Would be better to leave the user the
On 10/29/2015 11:39 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
David Malcolm writes:
* adds -Wmisleading-indentation to -Wall
I have doubts this is a good idea. I'm sure this will break
a bazillion packages which (misguidedly) ship with -Wall -Werror.
Would be better to leave the user the choice, given that
David Malcolm writes:
>
> * adds -Wmisleading-indentation to -Wall
I have doubts this is a good idea. I'm sure this will break
a bazillion packages which (misguidedly) ship with -Wall -Werror.
Would be better to leave the user the choice, given that such a thing
was historically never checked
The following patches:
* tweak -Wmisleading-indentation to suppress a kind of false
positive that occurred in three places in gcc's source
tree, and
* fix the two remaining truly misleadingly-indented places
where the warning fires
* adds -Wmisleading-indentation to -Wall
Boot
