Re: [PATCH 0/3] testsuite: RISC-V: Improve support for RV32E

2025-01-07 Thread Dimitar Dimitrov
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 07:55:45AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:13:22 PST (-0800), dimi...@dinux.eu wrote: > > Many test cases implicitly require some form of I ABI variant for > > RISC-V to be the default. Hence they fail when ILP32E is configured as > > the default ABI f

Re: [PATCH 0/3] testsuite: RISC-V: Improve support for RV32E

2025-01-07 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:13:22 PST (-0800), dimi...@dinux.eu wrote: Many test cases implicitly require some form of I ABI variant for RISC-V to be the default. Hence they fail when ILP32E is configured as the default ABI for the toolchain. Example error: spawn ... -march=rv32gc_zbb ...

Re: [PATCH 0/3] testsuite: RISC-V: Improve support for RV32E

2024-12-09 Thread Kito Cheng
Oh i just saw other part before i saw cover letter, anyway, LGTM for this patch set, thanks :) Dimitar Dimitrov 於 2024年12月10日 週二 00:16 寫道: > Many test cases implicitly require some form of I ABI variant for > RISC-V to be the default. Hence they fail when ILP32E is configured as > the default A

[PATCH 0/3] testsuite: RISC-V: Improve support for RV32E

2024-12-09 Thread Dimitar Dimitrov
Many test cases implicitly require some form of I ABI variant for RISC-V to be the default. Hence they fail when ILP32E is configured as the default ABI for the toolchain. Example error: spawn ... -march=rv32gc_zbb ... cc1: error: ILP32E ABI does not support the 'D' extension This p