On 8/15/19 12:21 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> 2) As noted on IRC, the version of automake used in the merge is 1.16.1 but
> the GCC prereqs are for 1.15.1. If it’s intended that automake-1.16.1 should
> be used could this requirement be documented somewhere?
Thank you for heads up. Yes, I should ha
Hi Martin,
> On 14 Aug 2019, at 17:18, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 8/14/19 2:50 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 8/13/19 5:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 8/13/19 7:07 AM, Martin Liska wrote:
Hi.
For this year, I decided to make a first merge now and the
next (much smaller) at the end
On 8/14/19 2:50 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 8/13/19 5:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 8/13/19 7:07 AM, Martin Liska wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> For this year, I decided to make a first merge now and the
>>> next (much smaller) at the end of October.
>>>
>>> The biggest change is rename of many files from
On 8/13/19 5:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 8/13/19 7:07 AM, Martin Liska wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> For this year, I decided to make a first merge now and the
>> next (much smaller) at the end of October.
>>
>> The biggest change is rename of many files from .cc to .cpp.
>>
>> I bootstrapped the patch set o
On 8/13/19 7:07 AM, Martin Liska wrote:
> Hi.
>
> For this year, I decided to make a first merge now and the
> next (much smaller) at the end of October.
>
> The biggest change is rename of many files from .cc to .cpp.
>
> I bootstrapped the patch set on x86_64-linux-gnu and run
> asan/ubsan/tsa
Hi.
For this year, I decided to make a first merge now and the
next (much smaller) at the end of October.
The biggest change is rename of many files from .cc to .cpp.
I bootstrapped the patch set on x86_64-linux-gnu and run
asan/ubsan/tsan tests on x86_64, ppc64le (power8) and
aarch64.
Libasan
