Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix PR debug/105089

2022-04-07 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 9:42 PM Indu Bhagat via Gcc-patches wrote: > > ping The series is OK > On 3/30/22 4:31 PM, Indu Bhagat wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This patch set fixes PR debug/105089. > > > > [PS: The first patch in the series "ctfc: get rid of the static variable in > > ctf_list_add_ctf_v

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix PR debug/105089

2022-04-07 Thread Indu Bhagat via Gcc-patches
ping On 3/30/22 4:31 PM, Indu Bhagat wrote: Hello, This patch set fixes PR debug/105089. [PS: The first patch in the series "ctfc: get rid of the static variable in ctf_list_add_ctf_vars" is unrelated to the PR and is combined here only for ease of review.] As noted in the PR debug/105089, gc

[PATCH 0/3] Fix PR debug/105089

2022-03-30 Thread Indu Bhagat via Gcc-patches
Hello, This patch set fixes PR debug/105089. [PS: The first patch in the series "ctfc: get rid of the static variable in ctf_list_add_ctf_vars" is unrelated to the PR and is combined here only for ease of review.] As noted in the PR debug/105089, gcc is emitting two CTF variable records where it