[ping3][PATCH 0/2] __bos and flex arrays

ping! On 2022-12-21 17:25, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: Hi, The first patch in the series is just a minor test cleanup that I did to make sure all tests in a test case run (instead of aborting at first failure) and print the ones that failed. The second patch is the actual fix. The patch intends

[ping2][PATCH 0/2] __bos and flex arrays

Ping! On 2022-12-21 17:25, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: Hi, The first patch in the series is just a minor test cleanup that I did to make sure all tests in a test case run (instead of aborting at first failure) and print the ones that failed. The second patch is the actual fix. The patch intends

[ping][PATCH 0/2] __bos and flex arrays

Ping! On 2022-12-21 17:25, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: Hi, The first patch in the series is just a minor test cleanup that I did to make sure all tests in a test case run (instead of aborting at first failure) and print the ones that failed. The second patch is the actual fix. The patch intends

[PATCH 0/2] __bos and flex arrays

Hi, The first patch in the series is just a minor test cleanup that I did to make sure all tests in a test case run (instead of aborting at first failure) and print the ones that failed. The second patch is the actual fix. The patch intends to make __bos/__bdos do the right thing with structs co