Ping the following two patches to add IEEE 128-bit minimum, maximu, and
conditional move support:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/554460.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/554461.html
--
Michael Meissner, IBM
IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Li
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 04:56:27PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:24:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches:
> >
> > > These patches are my latest versions of the patches to add IEEE 128-bit
> > > min,
> > > max, and conditional
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:24:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches:
>
> > These patches are my latest versions of the patches to add IEEE 128-bit min,
> > max, and conditional move to GCC. They correspond to the earlier patches #3
> > and #4 (patches #1 and #2 ha
* Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches:
> These patches are my latest versions of the patches to add IEEE 128-bit min,
> max, and conditional move to GCC. They correspond to the earlier patches #3
> and #4 (patches #1 and #2 have been installed).
Is this about IEEE min or IEEE minimum? My understan
These patches are my latest versions of the patches to add IEEE 128-bit min,
max, and conditional move to GCC. They correspond to the earlier patches #3
and #4 (patches #1 and #2 have been installed).
The first patch just adds support for the xsmincqp and xsmaxcqp instructions.
Due to the NaN rul
