Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve MSP430 hardware multiply support

2020-11-19 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 11/17/20 7:47 AM, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote: > In addition to the default config, I would suggest: > msp430-sim/-mcpu=msp430 > Test the 430 ISA > msp430-sim/-mlarge/-mcode-region=either > Test the large memory model with data assumed to be in the lower > memory region (default,

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve MSP430 hardware multiply support

2020-11-17 Thread Jozef Lawrynowicz
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 06:36:17PM -0700, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > On 11/15/20 2:14 PM, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote: > > The attached patch series improves MSP430 hardware multiply support, by > > improving code generation when setting up the 16-bit and 32-bit hardware > > multiply funct

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve MSP430 hardware multiply support

2020-11-16 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 11/15/20 2:14 PM, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote: > The attached patch series improves MSP430 hardware multiply support, by > improving code generation when setting up the 16-bit and 32-bit hardware > multiply functions, and adding a 64-bit hardware multiply library > function for devices that have

[PATCH 0/2] Improve MSP430 hardware multiply support

2020-11-15 Thread Jozef Lawrynowicz
The attached patch series improves MSP430 hardware multiply support, by improving code generation when setting up the 16-bit and 32-bit hardware multiply functions, and adding a 64-bit hardware multiply library function for devices that have a 32-bit hardware multiplier. Successfully regtested GCC