Re: [PATCH 0/2] Convert ia64 to atomic optabs

2011-11-17 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 08:53 -1000, Richard Henderson wrote: > This is relatively straight-forward, given that most of the > language actually matches up with the opcodes. ;-) > > As mentioned in the patch itself, this is based on the data > presented in > >http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/cpp

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Convert ia64 to atomic optabs

2011-11-15 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > I'll try to test it but I am currently trying to track down a bootstrap > failure on IA64 HP-UX that appears to have started somewhere between > r181238 and r181287.  My IA64 HP-UX build currently fails with: > > build/genmddeps /ctires/gcc/n

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Convert ia64 to atomic optabs

2011-11-15 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 08:53 -1000, Richard Henderson wrote: > This is relatively straight-forward, given that most of the > language actually matches up with the opcodes. ;-) > > As mentioned in the patch itself, this is based on the data > presented in > >http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/cpp

[PATCH 0/2] Convert ia64 to atomic optabs

2011-11-15 Thread Richard Henderson
This is relatively straight-forward, given that most of the language actually matches up with the opcodes. ;-) As mentioned in the patch itself, this is based on the data presented in http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/cpp/cpp0xmappings.html which has a few non-obvious points. Tested on ia64-