On 21/07/11 14:14, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Here is the patch I plan to commit, when patch 1 is approved, and my
testing is complete.
Committed, unchanged.
Andrew
On 18/07/11 15:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
Will signedness be always the same? Usually the canonical check to
use would be !useless_type_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (add_rhs)).
The signedness ought to be unimportant - any extend will be based on the
source type, and the signedness should no
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the patch series so far works great as long as the
> input type of the accumulate value is the same as the output type.
> Unfortunately you get an ICE otherwise doh!
>
> This patch should fix the problem.
>
> I coul
As far as I can tell, the patch series so far works great as long as the
input type of the accumulate value is the same as the output type.
Unfortunately you get an ICE otherwise doh!
This patch should fix the problem.
I could have inserted this fix into the correct spot in the existing
