On 11/10/14 09:59, Renlin Li wrote:
On 06/11/14 18:07, Renlin Li wrote:
On 06/11/14 17:59, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Thanks for fixing the test case. Can you also add the comment I
suggested to the source change?
Please add a comment that this is needed due to insane incoming
frequencies.
Sorr
Hi Renlin,
Looks like Jeff already approved it:
>Can you add a testcase please? With a testcase, this patch is OK for the
>trunk.
Teresa
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
> On 06/11/14 18:07, Renlin Li wrote:
>>
>> On 06/11/14 17:59, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for f
On 06/11/14 18:07, Renlin Li wrote:
On 06/11/14 17:59, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Thanks for fixing the test case. Can you also add the comment I
suggested to the source change?
Please add a comment that this is needed due to insane incoming
frequencies.
Sorry, I mistakenly add it to the Change
On 06/11/14 17:59, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Thanks for fixing the test case. Can you also add the comment I
suggested to the source change?
Please add a comment that this is needed due to insane incoming frequencies.
Sorry, I mistakenly add it to the ChangeLog. Should be correct now.
x86_64-u
Thanks for fixing the test case. Can you also add the comment I
suggested to the source change?
> Please add a comment that this is needed due to insane incoming frequencies.
Thanks,
Teresa
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
> Hi Teresa,
>
> Thank you for the suggestion, updated!
Hi Teresa,
Thank you for the suggestion, updated!
Please add a comment that this is needed due to insane incoming frequencies.
The 'b' variable is uninitialized. Also, 'd' and 'a' may end up
uninitialized depending on the initial value of 'b'. Please initialize
these.
Test case has been add
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Test case has been added. With the patch, both x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and
> aarch64-none-elf compile the test case successfully.
>
> Okay to commit?
>
>
> On 04/11/14 21:59, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 11/03/14 08:29, Renlin Li wrote
Hi Jeff,
Test case has been added. With the patch, both x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
and aarch64-none-elf compile the test case successfully.
Okay to commit?
On 04/11/14 21:59, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/03/14 08:29, Renlin Li wrote:
On 29/10/14 12:42, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Hi Renlin,
Are the inc
On 11/03/14 08:29, Renlin Li wrote:
On 29/10/14 12:42, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Hi Renlin,
Are the incoming edge counts or probabilities insane in this case? I
guess the patch is ok if we need to do this to handle those incoming
insanitiles. But I can't approve patches myself.
Not really, it's j
On 29/10/14 12:42, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Hi Renlin,
Are the incoming edge counts or probabilities insane in this case? I
guess the patch is ok if we need to do this to handle those incoming
insanitiles. But I can't approve patches myself.
Not really, it's just a little bigger than the limit.
Hi Renlin,
Are the incoming edge counts or probabilities insane in this case? I
guess the patch is ok if we need to do this to handle those incoming
insanitiles. But I can't approve patches myself.
However, this is a fix to code (r215739) committed after the ICE in
the original bug report and in
Hi all,
This is a simple patch to fix ICE in comment 2 of PR61529:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61529
Bound checking code is added to make sure the frequency is within legal
range.
As far as I have observed, r215830 patch fixes the glibc building ICE.
And this patch should
12 matches
Mail list logo
