Re: [PATCH] xtensa: Improve indirect sibling call handling

2022-08-18 Thread Max Filippov via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 3:06 AM Takayuki 'January June' Suwa wrote: > > No longer needs the dedicated hard register (A11) for the address of the > call and the split patterns for fixups, due to the introduction of appropriate > register class and constraint. > > (Note: "ISC_REGS" contains a hard r

[PATCH] xtensa: Improve indirect sibling call handling

2022-08-18 Thread Takayuki 'January June' Suwa via Gcc-patches
No longer needs the dedicated hard register (A11) for the address of the call and the split patterns for fixups, due to the introduction of appropriate register class and constraint. (Note: "ISC_REGS" contains a hard register A8 used as a "static chain" pointer for nested functions, but no proble