On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> >>> On 27.06.19 at 12:58, wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:49 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> >>> On 27.06.19 at 12:20, wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:57 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> - the affine transformations are
>>> On 27.06.19 at 12:58, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:49 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> >>> On 27.06.19 at 12:20, wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:57 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>
>> >> - the affine transformations are not commutative (the two source
>> >> operands have entirely diff
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:49 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> >>> On 27.06.19 at 12:20, wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:57 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> - the affine transformations are not commutative (the two source
> >> operands have entirely different meaning)
> >> - there's no need for
>>> On 27.06.19 at 12:20, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:57 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> - the affine transformations are not commutative (the two source
>> operands have entirely different meaning)
>> - there's no need for three alternatives
>> - the nonimmediate_operand/Bm combination can
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:57 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> - the affine transformations are not commutative (the two source
> operands have entirely different meaning)
> - there's no need for three alternatives
> - the nonimmediate_operand/Bm combination can better be vector_operand/m
>
> gcc/
> 20
- the affine transformations are not commutative (the two source
operands have entirely different meaning)
- there's no need for three alternatives
- the nonimmediate_operand/Bm combination can better be vector_operand/m
gcc/
2019-06-27 Jan Beulich
* config/i386/sse.md (vgf2p8affinei